I was looking back at my notes and
comments from our classes and there are distinct themes that stand out for
me. I would like to classify these themes that emerged for me as the with
the hidden curriculum of the course for me.
Preamble:
To begin with I was not sure how I
would fit is; as I don't see myself as an active philosopher, but enjoy
listening to philosopher's arguments and presentations. Was I looking though a
lens and reserving my thoughts and views? It was almost a room of awe that I
have often glimpsed at but never have the nerve or courage to step in and
imbibe the dimensions of that space. After progressing through the year one of UTC I
was confident to push myself to the next level. I had groped around and dabbled
with the different methods and intricacies of teaching and had reached a space
where I could see the influences of these course in my teaching philosophy. My
mentor took the time to explain and give me material to read on
to understand the result of the baseline tests. It opened my eyes to
the type of teacher I am and how I could develop it further. My baseline tests
have changed dramatically from before and after year one. I had a more balanced
approach in the post tests.
Blog one and metaphors: This was a
great start; to go into the depths of what we see our students as and how we
balance it as teachers. As a class we came up with very varying metaphors,
octopus and sea voyagers; owl and chimpanzees, waiters and diners, coach
and athlete and sheepdog and grazers. Overall, we the teachers were
the guides in more or less structured learning environments. The
management of the role as teachers and the infusing the learning environment
with stimuli that generated learning out of hidden caves, creating
opportunities to climb to new heights, providing different flavours and
textures that may scintillate learning, developing relationships
where the students are willing to share and exchanges ideas while the
facilitator is actively modulating the exchange within a safe
environment and keeping in line with the relevance of the outcomes of the
course. We claim to be are very involved teachers who respect and value the
impact and responsibilities as teachers. Over the length of the blogs we
supported our claims with evidence; we made an attempt at grounding the claim
in critical reflection. The metaphor aligned with my philosophy of adult
education (humanistic and progressive). This was our initiation into
scholarly teaching.
Class two: questions, assumptions
and rationale: A question that meets all the Rasmussen characteristics. In our
blogs we teased out the assumptions and looked for evidence and relevance of
the questions. Inquiry based learning and critical thinking set the direction
toward a more autonomic learning environment. Definition of a course may need
to be made explicit before
the structure can be made sense of and every question has underlying
assumptions that need to be addressed. These assumptions define the question
and the rationale could be completely reflective but once it is based on
relevant evidence you add value to the question. This was our initiation to the
challenge phase.
Class three: research methodology
was the theme I received from this class. Determining reliability, relevance
and acceptability of the claims made in the references we used. I learned that if
you could find even one falsifying evidence, then the claim hold no grounds.
The logic of sound, justified claims is more in the relevance to support the
claim. The logic that implied being that if the premises are right then the
claim is right. We were challenged to support out claims with relevant and reliable research
material and not accept all the evidence presented as absolutes. The challenge
continues....
Class four, five & six: Do all
of us have the same definition of what education is and how do we define it?
This class rocked me and urged me to think of what am I basing my life's work
on? Can we justify our belief as the truth? The challenges at this point
were deep and brutal. Why do we believe what we believe? what justification can
we provide to support our belief and is that the truth..? Does acquiring
education equate to being wise? At this point I looked at the learning methods
and how learning could be deep and how it could be carried through to our daily
activities if the learning was internalized. This theme continued in class 5
and 6. By then I realized that my belief is riddled with absolute facts and
jargon; which, is not so absolute or clear for the recipient. The only way to make it obvious
is to sometimes break the sequence into separate events and justify each. We continued to look at
the connotations, implication and denotations associated with words we
use.
Class seven: We had a session of
live blogging and receiving the feedback was interesting and insightful. At
this point in our blogs we had explored the teachers we are and challenged how
and where we could match the expectations we have from within out. What I found astounding was that
each of us from such varied disciplined had identified the values and attitudes
that could apply across the broad. That spoke to how education is knowledge,
values and attitudes; irrespective of the discipline.
Class eight: revolving around the
developmental piece for me was to develop a skeptical outlook toward what I
read and come across. I had to change my lenses here; where knowledge is white
light and the spectrum of colors being its application to knowledge being
a kaleidoscope where
these colors are combined in different changing shapes. The students bringing
in their own knowledge base, adds more and more facets to the knowledge piece. Do I understand the changes and
can I justify the direction of change and can I predict the next pattern
formation or should I? What is my role as an educator? Can I add more color and
throw in the skills and attitude with intention in a predetermined manner. Are
we developing with the curriculum we develop?
My peers blogs took me through the
theories of Plato, Socrates through
the matrix and aspects of training versus teaching, competencies
and attitudes and
how they apply professional courses. Various aspects of constructivism and positivism. Tranformational learning
and reflective teaching and being a reflective teacher. I have so much more to
reflect on. The last blog feedback on how much I want to incorporate as part of
my philosophy so that I could model the behaviors. I have gone back to my
philosophy of apprenticeship and
progressive teaching behaviors.
Can the assessment tasks capture the beliefs, knowledge, values, attitudes
reflected in the learning objective and demonstrated in the learning environment? I am now in a space where I can fuel my passion of teaching with appropriate values system that will definitely have a strong influence on teaching.